The National Institutes of Health introduced a new cap on funding allocation, and sent shockwaves across the U.S.'s top ...

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

Sweeping layoffs, funding freezes and executive orders have provoked outcry among federal researchers and their university partners, who fear that science itself is under siege.

After NIH-funded studies linked untreated hearing loss to health issues such as dementia, Hopkins professor Frank Lin ...

The National Institutes of Health under President Donald Trump announced this month that it was cutting payments covering ...

Grant funding uncertainty has jeopardized the sustainability of research projects and discouraged researchers.

The National Institutes of Health announced it would cap "Facilities and Administrative" costs at 15% for new and existing grants.

Although currently blocked by a federal court, the policy would limit research funding from NIH for “indirect costs,” or overhead expenses, to 15%.

Cancer researcher Karen Sfanos says she is 'terrified' of the impact of cuts to NIH funding that supports vital biomedical ...

The sudden policy change is that the NIH is to cap indirect cost recovery at 15 percent of the direct costs of a grant, ...

Proposed cuts by the Trump administration to a type of federal funding from the National Institutes of Health would pose a ...

What do National Institutes of Health funding cuts mean for universities? We ask Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of the journal ...