The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

Sweeping layoffs, funding freezes and executive orders have provoked outcry among federal researchers and their university partners, who fear that science itself is under siege.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has proposed drastic cuts to indirect funding for research grants, impacting major ...

Medical research facilities in West Michigan are voicing their concern following the Trump Administration’s proposal to cut ...

Federal workers in Maryland are speaking out against the Department of Government Efficiency and the layoffs and funding cuts ...

Ongoing uncertainty about funding from the National Institutes of Health could imperil medical research at academic ...

Johns Hopkins psychiatrist Paul Nestadt says cutting NIH funding for suicide prevention research is 'not just a fiscal ...

A Trump administration plan to cap reimbursement of federal research overhead costs could lead to job losses, stifle medical ...

The National Institutes for Health (NIH) cut indirect funding for research to 15%, according to supplemental guidance from the NIH. This includes a $35 million cut to the University of Connecticut ...

National Institutes of Health grants are essential for lifesaving medical research. A Trump administration policy now ...

The proposal would impact 67% of the research funded by the National Institutes of Health in Puerto Rico’s public university system. #NewsismyBusiness #CPI #CentrodePeriodismoInvestigativo ...

Amid worries about the Trump administration’s plans for research funding & higher education, major research universities have ...