Federal funding for medical research has dropped by roughly $1 billion this year, raising alarm among universities, medical ...
Inside a sprawling lab at the University of New England's Portland campus, scientists conduct research that could eventually ...
The National Institutes of Health introduced a new cap on funding allocation, and sent shockwaves across the U.S.'s top ...
My longevity is imperiled by presidential actions taken recently to curtail research funded ... curtailing funding streams or disrupting the basic structure of NIH will interfere with its current ...
The federal order temporarily halts the Trump administration’s plans to slash $4 billion in overhead costs for research at ...
President Trump last Friday slashed billions from scientific research grants — effective Monday. Trump has taken issue with ...
Days after the Trump administration announced billions of dollars in cuts to biomedical research ... cut in funding for universities in the middle of the academic year. The NIH said it would ...
So those individual research groups, doing their individual projects, will apply for [NIH] funding. For the overall laboratory itself, for the cost of running it, for the utilities, all those ...
Although currently blocked by a federal court, the policy would limit research funding from NIH for “indirect costs,” or overhead expenses, to 15%.
Each research project may have different indirect costs, experts say. For fiscal year 2023, NIH spent more than $35 billion in about 50,000 grants to more than 300,000 researchers at more than ...
NIH funding was set to be cut Monday until a federal judge stepped in and delayed the impact. Some health experts and ...
Statements from the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University suggest internal panic about the impact of ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results