Although currently blocked by a federal court, the policy would limit research funding from NIH for “indirect costs,” or ...
The Trump administration is exploiting a loophole to keep a funding freeze in place, leaving researchers in limbo.
The National Institutes of Health under President Donald Trump announced this month that it was cutting payments covering ...
The change would cap the "indirect cost" reimbursement rates for any grant at 15%. In contrast, Cold Spring Harbor Lab's ...
Any delays in progress by stalling grant-review processes, curtailing funding streams or disrupting the basic structure of NIH will interfere with its current operations, slow the momentum of ...
6don MSN
The National Institutes of Health proposal would limit indirect costs for research projects to 15 percent of grants.
Rochester, N.Y. (WHAM) — Recent efforts to reduce research funding from the National Institute of Health (NIH) have raised concerns among local universities and medical systems. BACKGROUND ...
NIH funding in Tennessee supports critical research on heart disease, stroke, cancer, dementia, Alzheimer's, and mental health conditions. On Feb. 7, the National Institutes of Health (NIH ...
After NIH-funded studies linked untreated hearing loss to health issues such as dementia, Hopkins professor Frank Lin ...
This means that out of the $35 billion NIH provides in grants, the amount devoted to overhead for things such as administration and facilities would be cut from $9 billion to $4.6 billion.
ST. LOUIS – Scientists around St. Louis worry their medical research will lose key funding as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced changes on how finance grants can be received.
A federal pause on research funding through NIH initiated last month by President Donald Trump through an executive order, as well as an announcement reducing the funds used to support work like ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results