The bureaucratic bloat in federal research funding is finally facing a long-overdue reckoning, especially for indirect ...

President Donald Trump should fire dozens of federal bureaucrats in health-related positions who have pushed diversity, ...

“Without relief from NIH’s action, these institutions’ cutting-edge work to cure and treat human disease will grind to a halt.” The NIH is the primary source of federal funding for medical ...

The National Institutes of Health has suddenly withdrawn researchers’ applications for a prestigious grant that were submitted with a diversity notation — effectively disqualifying many early ...

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) said late Friday it was setting a 15 percent limit on its funding of "indirect," or ...

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) on Friday made a significant reduction in grants reserved for research institutions, a decision that may significantly impact American higher education.

Dr. Lawrence Tabak, the No. 2 official at the National Institutes of Health, did not give a reason for his departure.

Here’s a look at what the Trump administration’s decision to cut overhead funding for biomedical research means for ...

The big losers would include prestigious institutions in conservative states. The NIH, the nation’s top funder of biomedical research, announced on Friday that it would substantially limit ...

Late Friday, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) said it would set a 15 percent cap on payments for indirect costs — which are administrative and facility costs linked to research ...

NIH announces it’s slashing funding for indirect research costs, raising concerns for universities and medical centers. NBC News’ Vaughn Hillyard has more details.

Among the work the NIH supports in the state, a University of West Florida researcher is studying early detection of Alzheimer’s disease, a Florida State University team was awarded $3.4 million ...