Federal funding for medical research has dropped by roughly $1 billion this year, raising alarm among universities, medical ...

Losing NIH funding, according to Dr. Lipton, would stop the research done at Michigan State University's College of Human ...

The National Institutes of Health introduced a new cap on funding allocation, and sent shockwaves across the U.S.'s top ...

Rice could lose up to $4 million in research funding due to cuts to National Institutes of Health grants, according to analysis by the New York Times. On Feb. 7, the NIH proposed a drastic slash of ...

Arizona’s hospitals and universities stand to lose tens of millions of dollars in funding for medical research amid National ...

Earlier this month, the National Institutes of Health announced that it would limit the amount of funding for indirect costs related to research to 15 percent. Indirect costs cover items such as ...

With federal support, universities produce world-changing discoveries and the next generation of exquisitely well-trained ...

The NIH says funding cuts would save it billions of dollars a year. D.C.-area industry and academic leaders say it would cripple R&D.

The funding agency aims to cap “indirect costs” in biomedical research grants. But this behind-the-scenes work is crucial to making research happen.

Sweeping layoffs, funding freezes and executive orders have provoked outcry among federal researchers and their university partners, who fear that science itself is under siege.

After NIH-funded studies linked untreated hearing loss to health issues such as dementia, Hopkins professor Frank Lin ...