The National Institutes of Health introduced a new cap on funding allocation, and sent shockwaves across the U.S.'s top ...
Federal funding for medical research has dropped by roughly $1 billion this year, raising alarm among universities, medical ...
Sweeping layoffs, funding freezes and executive orders have provoked outcry among federal researchers and their university partners, who fear that science itself is under siege.
Even a temporary pause could be devastating for people like me, desperately waiting for new treatments that are under ...
Johns Hopkins psychiatrist Paul Nestadt says cutting NIH funding for suicide prevention research is 'not just a fiscal ...
Applications for a prestigious NIH grant that supports Ph.D. students from marginalized backgrounds are not being funded.
Although currently blocked by a federal court, the policy would limit research funding from NIH for “indirect costs,” or overhead expenses, to 15%.
LA Times on MSN9d
NIH cuts put medical research at risk, scientists say, raising concerns at UC and elsewhereDrastic cuts to National Institutes of Health 'indirect funds' for medical research has prompted deep concerns at UC over how ...
NIH cancer testing, 1969. (Warren K. Leffler/Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division) On Monday, a federal judge temporarily averted disaster by halting the Trump administration’s ...
NIH announced it would limit indirect funding to 15% on Friday, but it is unclear how much money this will take from St. Jude hospital in Memphis.
The NIH, the largest funder of biomedical research in the U.S., will limit funding for indirect costs to 15%. Indirect costs cover expenses like building maintenance and administrative salaries.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback