Regardless of method, changing the Court as a reflexive response to politically undesirable decisions would not only be bad ...

The United States ... nominate Supreme Court justices lies with the President of the United States. Some of the most well-known Supreme Court cases in U.S. history include Brown v.

Robertson is the first rioter to be resentenced since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Fischer v. United States, where the ... using a large wooden stick to strike at least two.

The Supreme Court’s latest opinion on gun rights has done little so far to eliminate the disagreement and confusion among ...

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court ... The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free ...

But the Court avoided that issue by deciding the case on statutory grounds instead. The Supreme Court agreed with Elonis in an 8-1 opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts. He wrote that the ...

What is lenity? It is a rule of statutory construction under which ambiguous criminal laws are interpreted in favor of defendants, write Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan S. Sack.

United States v Rahimi presents a litmus test for the Supreme Court's conservative majority on what limitations, if any, should be imposed on gun rights. The Biden administration - represented by ...

The Court’s decision in RNC v. Mi Familia Vota ... where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from ...

Access to abortion remains a patchwork of state-by-state policies nearly two years after the Supreme ... Court overturned Roe v. Wade, with abortion restricted across most of the Southern United ...

(The Supreme Court ... However, in Lyon v. Animal House Zoo the court grants (as it often does) the Solicitor General’s request for divided argument. Because the Solicitor General will be arguing for ...